Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/SSC/FreeEnergy/PolytropesEmbedded"

From VistrailsWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Free-Energy of Truncated Polytropes: Finished re-derivation of "case P" free-energy function)
(→‎Free-Energy of Truncated Polytropes: Rearrange and clean up presentation --> in pretty good shape, now!)
Line 19: Line 19:
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
 
<!-- HIDE INTERMEDIATE EXPRESSION ...
<tr>
<tr>
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
Line 32: Line 32:
+ \biggl[\biggl(\frac{3}{4\pi}\biggr)^{1/n} \frac{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_A}{\tilde{\mathfrak{\mathfrak{f}}}_M^{(n+1)/n}}  \biggr] \frac{nKM^{(n+1)/n}}{R^{3/n}}
+ \biggl[\biggl(\frac{3}{4\pi}\biggr)^{1/n} \frac{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_A}{\tilde{\mathfrak{\mathfrak{f}}}_M^{(n+1)/n}}  \biggr] \frac{nKM^{(n+1)/n}}{R^{3/n}}
+ \frac{4\pi}{3} \cdot P_e R^3  
+ \frac{4\pi}{3} \cdot P_e R^3  
\, ,</math>
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
END EXPRESSION HIDING -->
<tr>
  <td align="right">
&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
- 3\mathcal{A} \biggl[\frac{GM^2}{R} \biggr] + n\mathcal{B} \biggl[ \frac{KM^{(n+1)/n}}{R^{3/n}} \biggr] + \frac{4\pi}{3} \cdot P_e R^3 \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
 
where the constants,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~\mathcal{A} \equiv \frac{1}{5} \cdot \frac{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_W}{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_M^2}</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; and &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\mathcal{B} \equiv \biggl(\frac{4\pi}{3} \biggr)^{-1/n} \frac{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_A}{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_M^{(n+1)/n}} \, ,</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
where, as [[User:Tohline/SSC/Virial/FormFactors#PTtable|derived elsewhere]],
 
and, as [[User:Tohline/SSC/Virial/FormFactors#PTtable|derived elsewhere]],


<div align="center" id="PTtable">
<div align="center" id="PTtable">
Line 170: Line 201:
</div>
</div>


In order to effectively visualize the structure of this free-energy surface, we will reduce the parameter space from four to two, in two separate ways:  First, we will hold constant the parameter pair, <math>~(K,M)</math>; adopting [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASJ...33..299K Kimura's (1981b)] nomenclature, we will refer to the resulting function, <math>~\mathfrak{G}_{K,M}(R,P_e)</math>, as an "M<sub>1</sub> Free-Energy Surface" because the mass is being held constant.  Second, we will hold constant the parameter pair, <math>~(K,P_e)</math>, and examine the resulting "P<sub>1</sub> Free-Energy Surface," <math>~\mathfrak{G}_{K,P_e}(R,M)</math>.
In order to effectively visualize the structure of this free-energy surface, we will reduce the parameter space from four to two, in two separate ways:  First, we will hold constant the parameter pair, <math>~(K,M)</math>; giving a nod to [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASJ...33..299K Kimura's (1981b)] nomenclature, we will refer to the resulting function, <math>~\mathfrak{G}_{K,M}(R,P_e)</math>, as a "Case M" free-energy surface because the mass is being held constant.  Second, we will hold constant the parameter pair, <math>~(K,P_e)</math>, and examine the resulting "Case P" free-energy surface, <math>~\mathfrak{G}_{K,P_e}(R,M)</math>.


==The M<sub>1</sub> Free-Energy Surface==
==Case M Free-Energy Surface==


It is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters.  Here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and pressure that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, <math>~G</math>, and the two fixed parameters, <math>~K</math> and <math>~M</math>.  We have chosen to use,
It is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters.  Here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and pressure that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, <math>~G</math>, and the two fixed parameters, <math>~K</math> and <math>~M</math>.  We have chosen to use,
Line 226: Line 257:
</div>
</div>


As we have [[User:Tohline/SphericallySymmetricConfigurations/Virial#Gathering_it_all_Together|demonstrated elsewhere]], after implementing these normalizations, the expression that describes the M<sub>1</sub> Free-Energy surface is,
As we have [[User:Tohline/SphericallySymmetricConfigurations/Virial#Gathering_it_all_Together|demonstrated elsewhere]], after implementing these normalizations, the expression that describes the "Case M" free-energy surface is,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>
<math>
\mathfrak{G}_{K,M}^* \equiv \frac{\mathfrak{G}_{K,M}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} =  
\mathfrak{G}_{K,M}^* \equiv \frac{\mathfrak{G}_{K,M}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} =  
-3A\biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr)^{-1} +~ nB \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr)^{-3/n}  
-3\mathcal{A} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr)^{-1} +~ n\mathcal{B} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr)^{-3/n}  
+~ \biggl( \frac{4\pi}{3} \biggr) \frac{P_e}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr)^3 \, ,
+~ \biggl( \frac{4\pi}{3} \biggr) \frac{P_e}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr)^3 \, ,
</math>
</math>
</div>
where the constants,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~A</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>\frac{1}{5} \cdot \frac{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_W}{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_M^2} \, ,</math>
  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>~B</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~\equiv</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>~
\biggl(\frac{4\pi}{3} \biggr)^{-1/n} \frac{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_A}{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_M^{(n+1)/n}} \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>


Given the polytropic index, <math>~n</math>, we expect to obtain a different M<sub>1</sub> free-energy surface for each choice of the dimensionless truncation radius, <math>~\tilde\xi</math>; this choice will imply corresponding values for <math>~\tilde\theta</math> and <math>~\tilde\theta^'</math> and, hence also, corresponding (constant) values of the coefficients, <math>~A</math> and <math>~B</math>.
Given the polytropic index, <math>~n</math>, we expect to obtain a different "Case M" free-energy surface for each choice of the dimensionless truncation radius, <math>~\tilde\xi</math>; this choice will imply corresponding values for <math>~\tilde\theta</math> and <math>~\tilde\theta^'</math> and, hence also, corresponding (constant) values of the coefficients, <math>~\mathcal{A}</math> and <math>~\mathcal{B}</math>.




==The P<sub>1</sub> Free-Energy Surface==
==Case P Free-Energy Surface==


Again, it is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters.  But here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and mass that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, <math>~G</math>, and the two fixed parameters, <math>~K</math> and <math>~P_e</math>.  As is [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/PolytropesEmbedded#Stahler.27s_Presentation|detailed in an accompanying discussion]], we have chosen to use the normalizations defined by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..165S Stahler (1983)], namely,
Again, it is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters.  But here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and mass that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, <math>~G</math>, and the two fixed parameters, <math>~K</math> and <math>~P_e</math>.  As is [[User:Tohline/SSC/Structure/PolytropesEmbedded#Stahler.27s_Presentation|detailed in an accompanying discussion]], we have chosen to use the normalizations defined by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..165S Stahler (1983)], namely,
Line 295: Line 296:
   </td>
   </td>
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~\biggl( \frac{n+1}{nG} \biggr)^{3/2} K^{2n/(n+1)} P_\mathrm{e}^{(3-n)/[2(n+1)]}  \, ,</math>
<math>~\biggl( \frac{n+1}{nG} \biggr)^{3/2} K^{2n/(n+1)} P_\mathrm{e}^{(3-n)/[2(n+1)]}  \, .</math>
   </td>
   </td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 322: Line 323:
</div>
</div>


After implementing these normalizations &#8212; see our [[User:Tohline/SSC/Virial/PolytropesEmbeddedOutline#Our_Case_M_Analysis|accompanying analysis]] for details &#8212; the expression that describes the P<sub>1</sub> Free-Energy surface is,
After implementing these normalizations &#8212; see our [[User:Tohline/SSC/Virial/PolytropesEmbeddedOutline#Our_Case_M_Analysis|accompanying analysis]] for details &#8212; the expression that describes the "Case P" free-energy surface is,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="5" align="center">
Line 706: Line 707:
END SUPPRESSION OF LONG DERIVATION -->
END SUPPRESSION OF LONG DERIVATION -->
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>~- 3A\biggl( \frac{n+1}{n} \biggr)\biggl( \frac{M}{M_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^2 \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^{-1}
<math>~- 3 \mathcal{A} \biggl( \frac{n+1}{n} \biggr)\biggl( \frac{M}{M_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^2 \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^{-1}
+ nB \biggl(\frac{M}{M_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^{(n+1)/n} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^{-3/n}  
+ n\mathcal{B} \biggl(\frac{M}{M_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^{(n+1)/n} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^{-3/n}  
+ \frac{4\pi}{3} \cdot \biggl( \frac{R}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^3  
+ \frac{4\pi}{3} \cdot \biggl( \frac{R}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^3 \, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 714: Line 715:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
Given the polytropic index, <math>~n</math>, we expect to obtain a different "Case P" free-energy surface for each choice of the dimensionless truncation radius, <math>~\tilde\xi</math>; this choice will imply corresponding values for <math>~\tilde\theta</math> and <math>~\tilde\theta^'</math> and, hence also, corresponding (constant) values of the coefficients, <math>~\mathcal{A}</math> and <math>~\mathcal{B}</math>.


=See Also=
=See Also=

Revision as of 16:07, 13 July 2016

Free-Energy of Truncated Polytropes

Whitworth's (1981) Isothermal Free-Energy Surface
|   Tiled Menu   |   Tables of Content   |  Banner Video   |  Tohline Home Page   |


In this case, the Gibbs-like free energy is given by the sum of three separate energies,

<math>~\mathfrak{G}</math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>~W_\mathrm{grav} + \mathfrak{S}_\mathrm{therm} + P_eV</math>

 

<math>~=</math>

<math>~ - 3\mathcal{A} \biggl[\frac{GM^2}{R} \biggr] + n\mathcal{B} \biggl[ \frac{KM^{(n+1)/n}}{R^{3/n}} \biggr] + \frac{4\pi}{3} \cdot P_e R^3 \, ,</math>

where the constants,

<math>~\mathcal{A} \equiv \frac{1}{5} \cdot \frac{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_W}{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_M^2}</math>

      and     

<math>\mathcal{B} \equiv \biggl(\frac{4\pi}{3} \biggr)^{-1/n} \frac{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_A}{\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}_M^{(n+1)/n}} \, ,</math>

and, as derived elsewhere,

Structural Form Factors for Pressure-Truncated Polytropes <math>~(n \ne 5)</math>

<math>~\tilde\mathfrak{f}_M</math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>~ \biggl( - \frac{3\tilde\theta^'}{\tilde\xi} \biggr) </math>

<math>\tilde\mathfrak{f}_W</math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>\frac{3\cdot 5}{(5-n)\tilde\xi^2} \biggl[\tilde\theta^{n+1} + 3 (\tilde\theta^')^2 - \tilde\mathfrak{f}_M \tilde\theta \biggr] </math>

<math>~ \tilde\mathfrak{f}_A </math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>~\frac{1}{(5-n)} \biggl\{ 6\tilde\theta^{n+1} + (n+1) \biggl[3 (\tilde\theta^')^2 - \tilde\mathfrak{f}_M \tilde\theta \biggr] \biggr\} </math>

As we have shown separately, for the singular case of <math>~n = 5</math>,

<math>~\mathfrak{f}_M</math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>~ ( 1 + \ell^2 )^{-3/2} </math>

<math>~\mathfrak{f}_W</math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>~ \frac{5}{2^4} \cdot \ell^{-5} \biggl[ \ell \biggl( \ell^4 - \frac{8}{3}\ell^2 - 1 \biggr)(1 + \ell^2)^{-3} + \tan^{-1}(\ell ) \biggr] </math>

<math>~\mathfrak{f}_A</math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>~ \frac{3}{2^3} \ell^{-3} [ \tan^{-1}(\ell ) + \ell (\ell^2-1) (1+\ell^2)^{-2} ] </math>

where, <math>~\ell \equiv \tilde\xi/\sqrt{3} </math>


In general, then, the warped free-energy surface drapes across a four-dimensional parameter "plane" such that,

<math>~\mathfrak{G}</math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>~\mathfrak{G}(R, K, M, P_e) \, .</math>

In order to effectively visualize the structure of this free-energy surface, we will reduce the parameter space from four to two, in two separate ways: First, we will hold constant the parameter pair, <math>~(K,M)</math>; giving a nod to Kimura's (1981b) nomenclature, we will refer to the resulting function, <math>~\mathfrak{G}_{K,M}(R,P_e)</math>, as a "Case M" free-energy surface because the mass is being held constant. Second, we will hold constant the parameter pair, <math>~(K,P_e)</math>, and examine the resulting "Case P" free-energy surface, <math>~\mathfrak{G}_{K,P_e}(R,M)</math>.

Case M Free-Energy Surface

It is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters. Here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and pressure that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, <math>~G</math>, and the two fixed parameters, <math>~K</math> and <math>~M</math>. We have chosen to use,

<math>~R_\mathrm{norm}</math>

<math>~\equiv</math>

<math>~\biggl[ \biggl( \frac{G}{K} \biggr)^n M_\mathrm{tot}^{n-1} \biggr]^{1/(n-3)} \, ,</math>

<math>~P_\mathrm{norm}</math>

<math>~\equiv</math>

<math>~\biggl[ \frac{K^{4n}}{G^{3(n+1)} M_\mathrm{tot}^{2(n+1)}} \biggr]^{1/(n-3)} \, ,</math>

which, as is detailed in an accompanying discussion, are similar but not identical to the normalizations used by Horedt (1970) and by Whitworth (1981). The self-consistent energy normalization is,

<math>~E_\mathrm{norm}</math>

<math>~\equiv</math>

<math>~P_\mathrm{norm} R^3_\mathrm{norm} \, .</math>

As we have demonstrated elsewhere, after implementing these normalizations, the expression that describes the "Case M" free-energy surface is,

<math> \mathfrak{G}_{K,M}^* \equiv \frac{\mathfrak{G}_{K,M}}{E_\mathrm{norm}} = -3\mathcal{A} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr)^{-1} +~ n\mathcal{B} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr)^{-3/n} +~ \biggl( \frac{4\pi}{3} \biggr) \frac{P_e}{P_\mathrm{norm}} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{norm}}\biggr)^3 \, , </math>

Given the polytropic index, <math>~n</math>, we expect to obtain a different "Case M" free-energy surface for each choice of the dimensionless truncation radius, <math>~\tilde\xi</math>; this choice will imply corresponding values for <math>~\tilde\theta</math> and <math>~\tilde\theta^'</math> and, hence also, corresponding (constant) values of the coefficients, <math>~\mathcal{A}</math> and <math>~\mathcal{B}</math>.


Case P Free-Energy Surface

Again, it is useful to rewrite the free-energy function in terms of dimensionless parameters. But here we need to pick normalizations for energy, radius, and mass that are expressed in terms of the gravitational constant, <math>~G</math>, and the two fixed parameters, <math>~K</math> and <math>~P_e</math>. As is detailed in an accompanying discussion, we have chosen to use the normalizations defined by Stahler (1983), namely,

<math>~R_\mathrm{SWS}</math>

<math>~\equiv</math>

<math>~\biggl( \frac{n+1}{nG} \biggr)^{1/2} K^{n/(n+1)} P_\mathrm{e}^{(1-n)/[2(n+1)]} \, ,</math>

<math>~M_\mathrm{SWS}</math>

<math>~\equiv</math>

<math>~\biggl( \frac{n+1}{nG} \biggr)^{3/2} K^{2n/(n+1)} P_\mathrm{e}^{(3-n)/[2(n+1)]} \, .</math>

The self-consistent energy normalization is,

<math>~E_\mathrm{SWS} \equiv \biggl( \frac{n}{n+1} \biggr) \frac{GM_\mathrm{SWS}^2}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}</math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>~ \biggl( \frac{n+1}{n} \biggr)^{3/2} G^{-3/2}K^{3n/(n+1)} P_\mathrm{e}^{(5-n)/[2(n+1)]} \, .</math>

After implementing these normalizations — see our accompanying analysis for details — the expression that describes the "Case P" free-energy surface is,

<math>~\mathfrak{G}_{K,P_e}^* \equiv \frac{\mathfrak{G}_{K,P_e}}{E_\mathrm{SWS}}</math>

<math>~=</math>

<math>~- 3 \mathcal{A} \biggl( \frac{n+1}{n} \biggr)\biggl( \frac{M}{M_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^2 \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^{-1} + n\mathcal{B} \biggl(\frac{M}{M_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^{(n+1)/n} \biggl(\frac{R}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^{-3/n} + \frac{4\pi}{3} \cdot \biggl( \frac{R}{R_\mathrm{SWS}}\biggr)^3 \, . </math>

Given the polytropic index, <math>~n</math>, we expect to obtain a different "Case P" free-energy surface for each choice of the dimensionless truncation radius, <math>~\tilde\xi</math>; this choice will imply corresponding values for <math>~\tilde\theta</math> and <math>~\tilde\theta^'</math> and, hence also, corresponding (constant) values of the coefficients, <math>~\mathcal{A}</math> and <math>~\mathcal{B}</math>.

See Also


Whitworth's (1981) Isothermal Free-Energy Surface

© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline
|   H_Book Home   |   YouTube   |
Appendices: | Equations | Variables | References | Ramblings | Images | myphys.lsu | ADS |
Recommended citation:   Tohline, Joel E. (2021), The Structure, Stability, & Dynamics of Self-Gravitating Fluids, a (MediaWiki-based) Vistrails.org publication, https://www.vistrails.org/index.php/User:Tohline/citation