Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/PGE/Hybrid Scheme"

From VistrailsWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Setting the Stage: More text to describe the hybrid scheme)
Line 114: Line 114:
===Alternative Reference Frames===
===Alternative Reference Frames===


Now, we might want to examine the time-dependent behavior of a distributed fluid system while viewing the flow from a reference frame that is more or less moving along with the fluid.  This new frame of reference need not be an inertial frame; for example, when studying a rotating fluid, we may want to view the system's evolution from a rotating frame of reference.  This will be accomplished mathematically by adjusting the dynamical equations so that the velocity that appears in the divergence term accounts for the new "frame" velocity field; specifically, we want to replace <math>~\vec{v}</math> with,
Now, we might want to examine the time-dependent behavior of a fluid system while viewing the flow from a reference frame that is more or less moving along with the fluid.  This new frame of reference need not be an inertial frame; for example, when studying a rotating fluid, we may want to view the system's evolution from a rotating frame of reference.  This will be accomplished mathematically by adjusting the dynamical equations so that the velocity that appears in the divergence term accounts for the new "frame" velocity field; specifically, we want to replace <math>~\vec{v}</math> with,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
Line 120: Line 120:
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>
<math>
\vec{v}_\mathrm{new}  
\vec{u}  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 134: Line 134:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
(Here, we will consider only time-independent functional expressions for the frame velocity, <math>~\vec{v}_\mathrm{frame}</math>.)  Of course, the introduction of <math>~\vec{v}_\mathrm{new}</math> must be done in such a way that the resulting, new PDE describes exactly the same physical behavior of the system as was described by the original equation; that is, the new equation must be derivable from the original one.   
(Here, we will consider only time-independent functional expressions for the frame velocity, <math>~\vec{v}_\mathrm{frame}</math>.)  Of course, switching to the rotating frame must be done in such a way that the resulting, new PDE describes exactly the same physical behavior of the system as was described by the original equation; that is, the new equation must be derivable from the original one.   


If <math>~\vec{v}_\mathrm{frame}</math> is a divergence-free velocity field, then the replacement is trivial.  For example, if we choose a frame of reference that is rotating uniformly with angular velocity, <math>~\Omega_0</math>, then,
If <math>~\vec{v}_\mathrm{frame}</math> is a divergence-free velocity field, then the transformation is trivial.  For example, if we choose a frame of reference that is rotating uniformly with angular velocity, <math>~\Omega_0</math>, then,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
Line 183: Line 183:
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>
<math>
\frac{d\psi}{dt} + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{v}_\mathrm{new}
\frac{d\psi}{dt} + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{u}
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 205: Line 205:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
while the generic hyperbolic PDE becomes,
so the new generic hyperbolic PDE becomes,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
Line 211: Line 211:
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>
<math>
\frac{d\psi}{dt} + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{v}_\mathrm{new}
\frac{d\psi}{dt} + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{u}
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 242: Line 242:
   <td align="left">
   <td align="left">
<math>
<math>
\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} + \vec{v}_\mathrm{new} \cdot \nabla\psi \, .
\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} + \vec{u} \cdot \nabla\psi \, .
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 248: Line 248:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
Hence, the "new" generic hyperbolic PDE can be rewritten as,
Hence, the "new" generic hyperbolic PDE derived above can be rewritten as,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
Line 254: Line 254:
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>
<math>
\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} + \vec{v}_\mathrm{new}\cdot \nabla\psi + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{v}_\mathrm{new}
\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} + \vec{u} \cdot \nabla\psi + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{u}
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 274: Line 274:
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>
<math>
\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot (\psi \vec{v}_\mathrm{new})
\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot (\psi \vec{u} )
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 290: Line 290:
This equation also is broadly recognized as a conservation statement because, when <math>~S = 0</math>, the variable <math>~\psi</math> will represent the volume density of a conserved quantity.  
This equation also is broadly recognized as a conservation statement because, when <math>~S = 0</math>, the variable <math>~\psi</math> will represent the volume density of a conserved quantity.  


We should emphasize that the inertial-frame version of this Eulerian conservation equation can be retrieved straightforwardly by setting <math>~\Omega_0 = 0</math>, which is equivalent to setting <math>~\vec{v}_\mathrm{new} = \vec{v}</math>.  It is,
We should emphasize that the inertial-frame version of this Eulerian conservation equation can be retrieved straightforwardly by setting <math>~\Omega_0 = 0</math>, which is equivalent to setting <math>~\vec{u} = \vec{v}</math>.  It is,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
Line 310: Line 310:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
The physics of the flow that is being described by this PDE is identical to the physics that is described by the preceding PDE.  But an important distinction must be made regarding how the two equations are ''interpreted.''  The "inertial frame" version of the equation provides the time-rate of change of <math>~\psi</math> at a fixed point in ''inertial'' space, while the "new" version provides the time-rate of change of <math>~\psi</math> at a fixed point in the"new" moving &#8212; in this case, ''rotating'' &#8212; coordinate frame.
The physics of the flow that is being described by this PDE is identical to the physics that is described by the preceding PDE.  But an important distinction must be made regarding how the two equations are ''interpreted.''  The "inertial frame" version of the equation (explicitly containing <math>~\vec{v}</math>) provides the time-rate of change of <math>~\psi</math> at a fixed point in ''inertial'' space, while the "new" version (explicitly containing <math>~\vec{u}</math>) provides the time-rate of change of <math>~\psi</math> at a fixed point in our "new" ''rotating'' coordinate frame.


===Angular Momentum Conservation===
===Angular Momentum Conservation===
Line 353: Line 353:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
and <math>~\psi = (\rho\varpi v_\phi)</math> is the ''inertial-frame'' angular momentum density, as measured with respect to the <math>~z</math>-coordinate axis.  As foreshadowed above &#8212; see the [[User:Tohline/PGE/Hybrid_Scheme#Recognizing_Statements_of_Conservatio|subsection titled, ''Recognizing Statements of Conservation'']] &#8212; the angular momentum of a Lagrangian fluid element will be conserved if the "source" term, <math>~S = 0</math>.  This situation will arise if, at the fluid element's location, the azimuthal pressure variation, <math>~\partial P/\partial\phi</math>, and the azimuthal variation in the gravitational potential, <math>~\partial \Phi/\partial\phi</math>, are both zero, or the two balance one another (''i.e.,''<math>~\partial P/\partial\phi=-\rho\partial\Phi/\partial\phi</math>).
and <math>~\psi = (\rho\varpi v_\phi)</math> is the ''inertial-frame'' angular momentum density, as measured with respect to the <math>~z</math>-coordinate axis.  As foreshadowed above &#8212; see the [[User:Tohline/PGE/Hybrid_Scheme#Recognizing_Statements_of_Conservatio|subsection titled, ''Recognizing Statements of Conservation'']] &#8212; the angular momentum of a Lagrangian fluid element will be conserved if the "source" term, <math>~S = 0</math>.  This situation will arise if, at the fluid element's location, the azimuthal pressure variation, <math>~\partial P/\partial\phi</math>, and the azimuthal variation in the gravitational potential, <math>~\partial \Phi/\partial\phi</math>, are both zero, or if the two balance one another (''i.e.,''<math>~\partial P/\partial\phi=-\rho\partial\Phi/\partial\phi</math>).


Based on the above discussion, we can equally well view the flow from a frame of reference that is rotating with a constant angular velocity, <math>~\Omega_0</math>, and write,  
Based on the above discussion, we can equally well view the flow from a frame of reference that is rotating with a constant angular velocity, <math>~\Omega_0</math>, and write,  
Line 361: Line 361:
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>
<math>
\frac{d(\rho \varpi v_\phi)}{dt} + (\rho \varpi v_\phi) \nabla\cdot \vec{v}_\mathrm{new}
\frac{d(\rho \varpi v_\phi)}{dt} + (\rho \varpi v_\phi) \nabla\cdot \vec{u}
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 375: Line 375:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
where,
where, as before,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
Line 381: Line 381:
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>
<math>
\vec{v}_\mathrm{new}  
\vec{u}  
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 415: Line 415:
</table>
</table>
</div>
</div>
If, however, one wants to follow the time-variation of the fluid's inertial-frame angular momentum at a fixed location on a rotating coordinate grid, then the appropriate Eulerian representation of this azimuthal component of the equation of motion is,
If, however, one wants to follow the time-variation of the fluid's inertial-frame angular momentum at a fixed location on a rotating coordinate grid, then the appropriate Eulerian representation of this azimuthal component of the equation of motion is obtained by replacing the "transport" velocity, <math>~\vec{v}</math> with <math>~\vec{u}</math>; specifically,  
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
Line 421: Line 421:
   <td align="right">
   <td align="right">
<math>
<math>
\frac{\partial (\rho \varpi v_\phi)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot [(\rho \varpi v_\phi) \vec{v}_\mathrm{new}]
\frac{\partial (\rho \varpi v_\phi)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot [(\rho \varpi v_\phi) \vec{u}]
</math>
</math>
   </td>
   </td>
Line 438: Line 438:
===An Element of the Hybrid Scheme===
===An Element of the Hybrid Scheme===


This last equation displays one subtle, but valuable element of the hybrid scheme developed by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010CQGra..27q5002C Call, Tohline, &amp; Lehner (2010)].  The velocity component, <math>~v_\phi</math>, that appears in the formulation of the relevant conserved quantity &#8212; the inertial-frame angular momentum density &#8212; is drawn from a velocity vector, <math>~\vec{v}</math>, that is different from the "transport" velocity vector, <math>~\vec{v}_\mathrm{new}</math>, that defines the Eulerian frame from which the dynamical evolution of the system is being viewed.
This last equation displays one subtle, but valuable, element of the hybrid scheme developed by [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010CQGra..27q5002C Call, Tohline, &amp; Lehner (2010)].  The velocity component, <math>~v_\phi</math>, that appears in the formulation of the relevant conserved quantity &#8212; the inertial-frame angular momentum density &#8212; is drawn from the velocity vector, <math>~\vec{v}</math>, which is different from the transport velocity vector, <math>~\vec{u}</math>, that defines the Eulerian frame from which the dynamical evolution of the system is being viewed. Usually this equation is written, instead, in a form such that the angular momentum density that appears inside the differential operators on the left-hand-side is expressed in terms of the azimuthal component of the transport velocity, <math>~u_\phi</math>.  See, for example, 
 
Usually, the angular momentum density is expressed in terms of the azimuthal component of the transport velocity, <math>~\vec{u}</math>; see, for example.  In this more familiar formulation, the momentum density and the transport velocity are both directly drawn from the same frame of reference. We can derive this more familiar formulation from our "hybrid" formulation by recognizing that,
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="3">
<tr>
  <td align="right">
<math>
v_\phi
</math>
  </td>
  <td align="center">
<math>~=~</math>
  </td>
  <td align="left">
<math>
u_\phi - \varpi\Omega_0 \, .
</math>
  </td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>


==Traditional Eulerian Representation (Review)==
==Traditional Eulerian Representation (Review)==

Revision as of 02:23, 1 March 2014

Hybrid Scheme

Whitworth's (1981) Isothermal Free-Energy Surface
|   Tiled Menu   |   Tables of Content   |  Banner Video   |  Tohline Home Page   |

Setting the Stage

Recognizing Statements of Conservation

When dealing with the compressible fluid equations, we will often encounter hyperbolic PDEs of the following form:

<math> \frac{d\psi}{dt} + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{v} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> S \, , </math>

where we are using <math>~\vec{v}</math> to represent the velocity field of the fluid as viewed from an inertial frame of reference, and the total (as opposed to partial) time derivative indicates the time-rate of change of <math>~\psi</math> is being measured in a so-called Lagrangian fashion, that is, at the location of some fluid element and moving along with that fluid element.

When we encounter a situation in which the "source" term, <math>~S</math>, on the right-hand side is zero, we will be able to identify the scalar variable, <math>~\psi</math>, as the volume density of some conserved quantity. For example, the continuity equation — which is a mathematical statement of mass conservation — has the form,

LSU Key.png

<math>\frac{d\rho}{dt} + \rho \nabla \cdot \vec{v} = 0</math>

      or, equivalently,      

<math> \frac{d\ln\rho}{dt} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> ~- \nabla\cdot \vec{v} \, , </math>

where, <math>~\rho</math> is the mass per unit volume or, simply, the mass density of the fluid element. Clearly, when the mass of a Lagrangian fluid element is conserved, the fluid element's mass density changes only in accordance with the divergence of the local velocity field.

Similarly, if we are following the evolution of a fluid that expands and contracts adiabatically, we should expect to encounter an equation of the form,

<math> \frac{ds}{dt} + s\nabla\cdot \vec{v} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> 0 \, , </math>

      or, equivalently,      

<math> \frac{d\ln s}{dt} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> ~- \nabla\cdot \vec{v} \, , </math>

where, <math>~s</math> is the entropy density of a Lagrangian fluid element. Or, if an axisymmetric distribution of fluid is moving in an axisymmetric potential, we should expect the azimuthal component of the fluid's angular momentum to be conserved, in which case we should expect to encounter a dynamical equation of the form,

<math> \frac{d(\rho \varpi v_\phi)}{dt} + (\rho \varpi v_\phi) \nabla\cdot \vec{v} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> 0 \, , </math>

where, <math>~\varpi</math> is the Lagrangian fluid element's (cylindrical radial) distance measured from the symmetry axis of the underlying potential and <math>~v_\phi = \varpi\dot\phi</math> is the azimuthal component of the inertial velocity field, <math>~\vec{v}</math>, at the location of the fluid element.

Alternative Reference Frames

Now, we might want to examine the time-dependent behavior of a fluid system while viewing the flow from a reference frame that is more or less moving along with the fluid. This new frame of reference need not be an inertial frame; for example, when studying a rotating fluid, we may want to view the system's evolution from a rotating frame of reference. This will be accomplished mathematically by adjusting the dynamical equations so that the velocity that appears in the divergence term accounts for the new "frame" velocity field; specifically, we want to replace <math>~\vec{v}</math> with,

<math> \vec{u} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> \vec{v} + \vec{v}_\mathrm{frame} \, . </math>

(Here, we will consider only time-independent functional expressions for the frame velocity, <math>~\vec{v}_\mathrm{frame}</math>.) Of course, switching to the rotating frame must be done in such a way that the resulting, new PDE describes exactly the same physical behavior of the system as was described by the original equation; that is, the new equation must be derivable from the original one.

If <math>~\vec{v}_\mathrm{frame}</math> is a divergence-free velocity field, then the transformation is trivial. For example, if we choose a frame of reference that is rotating uniformly with angular velocity, <math>~\Omega_0</math>, then,

<math> \vec{v}_\mathrm{frame} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> \boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_\phi (\varpi \Omega_0) \, , </math>

and, utilizing cylindrical coordinates,

<math> \nabla\cdot\vec{v}_\mathrm{frame} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> \frac{\partial(0)}{\partial \varpi} + \frac{1}{\varpi}\frac{\partial(\varpi \Omega_0)}{\partial \phi} + \frac{\partial(0)}{\partial z} = 0 \, . </math>

Hence,

<math> \frac{d\psi}{dt} + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{u} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> \frac{d\psi}{dt} + \psi \nabla\cdot [\vec{v} + \vec{v}_\mathrm{frame}] </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> \frac{d\psi}{dt} + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{v} \, , </math>

so the new generic hyperbolic PDE becomes,

<math> \frac{d\psi}{dt} + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{u} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> S \, , </math>

and we can be confident that this new PDE represents the physics of the system just as well as the original PDE.

Eulerian Representation

We can shift any of the PDEs from a Lagrangian to an Eulerian representation — and thereby use them to follow the time-rate of change of physical variables at a point in space that is fixed with respect to the chosen frame of reference — by using the following transformation to replace each total time derivative with a partial time derivative:

<math> \frac{d\psi}{dt} </math>

<math>~~~\rightarrow~~~</math>

<math> \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} + \vec{u} \cdot \nabla\psi \, . </math>

Hence, the "new" generic hyperbolic PDE derived above can be rewritten as,

<math> \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} + \vec{u} \cdot \nabla\psi + \psi \nabla\cdot \vec{u} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> S \, , </math>

or, more succinctly,

<math> \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot (\psi \vec{u} ) </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> S \, . </math>

This equation also is broadly recognized as a conservation statement because, when <math>~S = 0</math>, the variable <math>~\psi</math> will represent the volume density of a conserved quantity.

We should emphasize that the inertial-frame version of this Eulerian conservation equation can be retrieved straightforwardly by setting <math>~\Omega_0 = 0</math>, which is equivalent to setting <math>~\vec{u} = \vec{v}</math>. It is,

<math> \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot (\psi \vec{v}) </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> S \, . </math>

The physics of the flow that is being described by this PDE is identical to the physics that is described by the preceding PDE. But an important distinction must be made regarding how the two equations are interpreted. The "inertial frame" version of the equation (explicitly containing <math>~\vec{v}</math>) provides the time-rate of change of <math>~\psi</math> at a fixed point in inertial space, while the "new" version (explicitly containing <math>~\vec{u}</math>) provides the time-rate of change of <math>~\psi</math> at a fixed point in our "new" rotating coordinate frame.

Angular Momentum Conservation

When the three vector components of the Euler equation (of motion) are projected onto a nonrotating cylindrical coordinate grid, the azimuthal component of the Euler equation may be written as,

<math> \frac{d(\rho \varpi v_\phi)}{dt} + (\rho \varpi v_\phi) \nabla\cdot \vec{v} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -\frac{\partial P}{\partial\phi} - \rho \frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial\phi} \, . </math>

For this equation, the source term is identified as,

<math> ~S </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -\frac{\partial P}{\partial\phi} - \rho \frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial\phi} \, , </math>

and <math>~\psi = (\rho\varpi v_\phi)</math> is the inertial-frame angular momentum density, as measured with respect to the <math>~z</math>-coordinate axis. As foreshadowed above — see the subsection titled, Recognizing Statements of Conservation — the angular momentum of a Lagrangian fluid element will be conserved if the "source" term, <math>~S = 0</math>. This situation will arise if, at the fluid element's location, the azimuthal pressure variation, <math>~\partial P/\partial\phi</math>, and the azimuthal variation in the gravitational potential, <math>~\partial \Phi/\partial\phi</math>, are both zero, or if the two balance one another (i.e.,<math>~\partial P/\partial\phi=-\rho\partial\Phi/\partial\phi</math>).

Based on the above discussion, we can equally well view the flow from a frame of reference that is rotating with a constant angular velocity, <math>~\Omega_0</math>, and write,

<math> \frac{d(\rho \varpi v_\phi)}{dt} + (\rho \varpi v_\phi) \nabla\cdot \vec{u} </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -\frac{\partial P}{\partial\phi} - \rho \frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial\phi} \, , </math>

where, as before,

<math> \vec{u} </math>

<math>~\equiv~</math>

<math> \vec{v} + \boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_\phi \varpi\Omega_0 \, . </math>

Also, following the earlier discussion, if one wants to follow the time-variation of the fluid's inertial-frame angular momentum at a fixed location in inertial space, then the appropriate Eulerian representation of this azimuthal component of the equation of motion is,

<math> \frac{\partial (\rho \varpi v_\phi)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot [(\rho \varpi v_\phi) \vec{v}] </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> S \, . </math>

If, however, one wants to follow the time-variation of the fluid's inertial-frame angular momentum at a fixed location on a rotating coordinate grid, then the appropriate Eulerian representation of this azimuthal component of the equation of motion is obtained by replacing the "transport" velocity, <math>~\vec{v}</math> with <math>~\vec{u}</math>; specifically,

<math> \frac{\partial (\rho \varpi v_\phi)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot [(\rho \varpi v_\phi) \vec{u}] </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> S \, . </math>

An Element of the Hybrid Scheme

This last equation displays one subtle, but valuable, element of the hybrid scheme developed by Call, Tohline, & Lehner (2010). The velocity component, <math>~v_\phi</math>, that appears in the formulation of the relevant conserved quantity — the inertial-frame angular momentum density — is drawn from the velocity vector, <math>~\vec{v}</math>, which is different from the transport velocity vector, <math>~\vec{u}</math>, that defines the Eulerian frame from which the dynamical evolution of the system is being viewed. Usually this equation is written, instead, in a form such that the angular momentum density that appears inside the differential operators on the left-hand-side is expressed in terms of the azimuthal component of the transport velocity, <math>~u_\phi</math>. See, for example,

Usually, the angular momentum density is expressed in terms of the azimuthal component of the transport velocity, <math>~\vec{u}</math>; see, for example. In this more familiar formulation, the momentum density and the transport velocity are both directly drawn from the same frame of reference. We can derive this more familiar formulation from our "hybrid" formulation by recognizing that,

<math> v_\phi </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> u_\phi - \varpi\Omega_0 \, . </math>

Traditional Eulerian Representation (Review)

Here we review the traditional Eulerian representation of the Euler Equation, as has been discussed in detail earlier.

in terms of velocity:

The so-called "Eulerian form" of the Euler equation can be straightforwardly derived from the standard Lagrangian representation to obtain,

Eulerian Representation
of the Euler Equation,

<math>~\frac{\partial\vec{v}}{\partial t} + (\vec{v}\cdot \nabla) \vec{v}= - \frac{1}{\rho} \nabla P - \nabla \Phi</math>

in terms of momentum density:

Also, we can multiply this expression through by <math>~\rho</math> and combine it with the continuity equation to derive what is commonly referred to as the,

Conservative Form
of the Euler Equation,

<math>~\frac{\partial(\rho\vec{v})}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot [(\rho\vec{v})\vec{v}]= - \nabla P - \rho \nabla \Phi</math>

The second term on the left-hand-side of this last expression represents the divergence of the "dyadic product" of the vector momentum density (<math>~\rho</math><math>~\vec{v}</math>) and the velocity vector <math>~\vec{v}</math> and is sometimes written as, <math>\nabla\cdot [(\rho \vec{v}) \otimes \vec{v}]</math>.

Component Forms

Let's split the vector Euler equation into its three scalar components; various examples are identified in Table 1.

Example #

Grid

Momentum Vector

Basis

Rotating?

Basis

Frame

1

Cartesian

No

Cartesian

Inertial

2

Cylindrical

Yes <math>~(\Omega_0)</math>

Cylindrical

Rotating <math>~(\Omega_0)</math>

3

Cylindrical

Yes <math>~(\Omega_0)</math>

Cylindrical

Rotating <math>~(\omega_0)</math>

In the following expressions, we will use <math>~\vec{v}</math> to denote the fluid velocity when it is associated with the rate of fluid transport across the coordinate grid, and we will use <math>~\vec{u}</math> to denote the fluid velocity when it is associated with the momentum density that is being advected. In all cases, it should be understood that <math>~\vec{v} = \vec{u}</math>, as both vectors refer to the same fluid velocity. In addition, we will use a "prime" notation to indicate when a velocity is being viewed from a rotating frame of reference; specifically, we will consider rotation about the <math>~z</math>-axis of the coordinate system, that is,

<math>~v'_\phi</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math>~v_\phi - R\Omega_0 \, ,</math>

and,

<math>~u'_\phi</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math>~u_\phi - R\omega_0 \, ,</math>

but we will not insist that the two rotation frequencies, <math>~\Omega_0</math> and <math>~\omega_0</math>, have the same value. Hence, in general, <math>~(\vec{u})' \ne (\vec{v})'</math>. It is worth emphasizing that, because we will only be considering frame rotation about the <math>z</math>-axis, the cylindrical <math>R</math> and <math>z</math> components of the velocity are interchangeable, that is: <math>~u'_R = v'_R = u_R = v_R</math>; and <math>~u'_z = v'_z = u_z = v_z</math>.

Example #1

This is certainly the most familiar component set.

<math>\boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_x: ~~~\frac{\partial (\rho v_x)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot[(\rho v_x) \vec{v}~]</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial x} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x} \, , </math>

<math>\boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_y: ~~~\frac{\partial (\rho v_y)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot[(\rho v_y) \vec{v}~]</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial y} \, , </math>

<math>\boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_z: ~~~\frac{\partial (\rho v_z)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot[(\rho v_z) \vec{v}~]</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial z} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial z} \, , </math>

where, for any one of the three scalar PDEs, advection of the relevant component of the momentum density, <math>~\psi_i</math>, is handled via the operation,

<math> \nabla\cdot[\psi_{i} \vec{v} ] </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> \frac{\partial (\psi_i v_x)}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial (\psi_i v_y)}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial (\psi_i v_z)}{\partial z} \, . </math>

Example #2

This component set has been spelled out in, for example, equations (5) - (7) of Norman & Wilson (1978) and equations (11), (12), & (3) of New & Tohline (1997).

<math>\boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_R: ~~~~~~~\frac{\partial (\rho v_R)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot[(\rho v_R) \vec{v}~]</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial R} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial R} + \frac{(\rho R v_\phi)^2}{\rho R^3} + \rho\Omega_0^2 R + \frac{2\Omega_0 (\rho R v_\phi)}{R} \, , </math>

 

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial R} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial R} + \frac{\rho}{R} (v_\phi + R\Omega_0)^2 \, , </math>

<math>\boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_\phi: ~~~\frac{\partial (\rho R v_\phi)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot[(\rho R v_\phi) \vec{v}~]</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial \phi} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial \phi} - 2\rho (\Omega_0 R )v_R \, , </math>

<math>\boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_z: ~~~~~~~~\frac{\partial (\rho v_z)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot[(\rho v_z) \vec{v}~]</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial z} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial z} \, , </math>

where, as noted above,

<math> \nabla\cdot[\psi_{i} \vec{v} ] </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> \frac{\partial (\psi_i v_R)}{\partial R} + \frac{1}{R} \frac{\partial (\psi_i v_\phi)}{\partial\phi} + \frac{\partial (\psi_i v_z)}{\partial z} \, . </math>

Example #3

<math>~\boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_R:</math>

<math>~\frac{\partial (\rho u'_R)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot[\rho u'_R (\vec{v})'~]</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial R} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial R} + \frac{\rho}{R} (v'_\phi + R\Omega_0)^2 </math>

 

 

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial R} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial R} + \frac{\rho (v'_\phi)^2}{R} + 2\rho \Omega_0 v'_\phi + \rho \Omega_0^2 R \, , </math>

<math>~\boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_\phi:</math>

<math>~\frac{\partial \{\rho R [u'_\phi + R(\Omega_0 - \omega_0)]\} }{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot[ \{ \rho R [u'_\phi + R(\Omega_0 - \omega_0)] \} (\vec{v})'~]</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial \phi} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial \phi} - 2\rho R\omega_0 v'_R \, , </math>

<math>~\boldsymbol{\hat{e}}_z:</math>

<math>~\frac{\partial (\rho u'_z)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot[\rho u'_z (\vec{v})'~]</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> -~\frac{\partial P}{\partial z} - \rho \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial z} \, , </math>

where, as noted above,

<math>~u'_\phi</math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math>~u_\phi - R\omega_0 \, ,</math>

and, for any one of the three scalar PDEs, advection of the relevant component of the momentum density, <math>~\psi_i</math>, is handled via the operation,

<math> \nabla\cdot[\psi_{i} (\vec{v})' ] </math>

<math>~=~</math>

<math> \frac{\partial (\psi_i v'_R)}{\partial R} + \frac{1}{R} \frac{\partial (\psi_i v'_\phi)}{\partial\phi} + \frac{\partial (\psi_i v'_z)}{\partial z} </math>

 

<math>~=~</math>

<math> \frac{\partial (\psi_i v_R)}{\partial R} + \frac{1}{R} \frac{\partial [\psi_i (v_\phi - R\Omega_0)]}{\partial\phi} + \frac{\partial (\psi_i v_z)}{\partial z} \, . </math>

Related Discussions


Whitworth's (1981) Isothermal Free-Energy Surface

© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline
|   H_Book Home   |   YouTube   |
Appendices: | Equations | Variables | References | Ramblings | Images | myphys.lsu | ADS |
Recommended citation:   Tohline, Joel E. (2021), The Structure, Stability, & Dynamics of Self-Gravitating Fluids, a (MediaWiki-based) Vistrails.org publication, https://www.vistrails.org/index.php/User:Tohline/citation