Difference between revisions of "User:Tohline/SR/PressureCombinations"

From VistrailsWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Begin cleaning up discussion of "combined pressures")
(→‎Just Ideal-Gas and Radiation: Clean up a few paragraphs)
Line 151: Line 151:
In certain density-temperature regimes, contributions from the electron degeneracy pressure can be ignored and, to a good approximation, the normalized total pressure will take the form,
In certain density-temperature regimes, contributions from the electron degeneracy pressure can be ignored and, to a good approximation, the normalized total pressure will take the form,
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>p_\mathrm{total} =  C_g \chi^3 \tau + C_r \tau^4 ,</math>
<math>~p_\mathrm{total} =  C_g \chi^3 \tau + C_r \tau^4 ,</math>
</div>
</div>
where the coefficients,
where the coefficients,
Line 159: Line 159:
</math>
</math>
</div>
</div>
Given any values for the pair of state variables, <math>\chi</math> and <math>\tau</math>, the third state variable can be calculated analytically from this specified function, <math>p_\mathrm{total}(\chi,\tau)</math>.  It is easy to see as well that, given any values for the pair of state variables, <math>p_\mathrm{total}</math> and <math>\tau</math>, the third state variable can be calculated analytically from the function,  
Given any values for the pair of state variables, <math>~\chi</math> and <math>~\tau</math>, the third state variable can be calculated analytically from this specified function, <math>~p_\mathrm{total}(\chi,\tau)</math>.  It is easy to see as well that, given any values for the pair of state variables, <math>~p_\mathrm{total}</math> and <math>~\tau</math>, the third state variable can be calculated analytically from the function,  
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
<math>\chi^3(p_\mathrm{total},\tau) =  \frac{1}{C_g \tau} \biggl[ p_\mathrm{total} - C_r \tau^4 \biggr] .</math>
<math>\chi^3(p_\mathrm{total},\tau) =  \frac{1}{C_g \tau} \biggl[ p_\mathrm{total} - C_r \tau^4 \biggr] .</math>
</div>
</div>
The third desirable relationship between the three state variables, <math>\tau(p_\mathrm{total},\chi^3)</math>, can also be expressed analytically, but the resulting expression is not as simple as the first two because it results from the solution of a quartic equation.  As is [http://www.vistrails.org/index.php/User:Tohline/SR/Ptot_QuarticSolution detailed in the accompanying discussion], the proper expression is,
The third desirable relationship between the three state variables, <math>~\tau(p_\mathrm{total},\chi^3)</math>, can also be expressed analytically, but the resulting expression is not as simple as the first two because it results from the solution of a quartic equation.  As is [[User:Tohline/SR/Ptot_QuarticSolution|detailed in the accompanying discussion]], the proper expression is,


{{LSU_HBook_footer}}
{{LSU_HBook_footer}}

Revision as of 02:47, 13 July 2015

Total Pressure

Whitworth's (1981) Isothermal Free-Energy Surface
|   Tiled Menu   |   Tables of Content   |  Banner Video   |  Tohline Home Page   |

In our overview of equations of state, we identified analytic expressions for the pressure of an ideal gas, <math>~P_\mathrm{gas}</math>, electron degeneracy pressure, <math>~P_\mathrm{deg}</math>, and radiation pressure, <math>~P_\mathrm{rad}</math>. Rather than considering these relations one at a time, in general we should consider the contributions to the pressure that are made by all three simultaneously. That is, we should examine the total pressure,

<math> ~P_\mathrm{total} = P_\mathrm{gas} + P_\mathrm{deg} + P_\mathrm{rad} . </math>

In order to assess which of these three contributions will dominate <math>~P_\mathrm{total}</math> in different density and temperature regimes, it is instructive to normalize <math>~P_\mathrm{total}</math> to the characteristic Fermi pressure, <math>~A_\mathrm{F}</math>, as defined in the accompanying Variables Appendix. As derived below, this normalized total pressure can be written as,

LSU Key.png

<math>~p_\mathrm{total} = \biggl(\frac{\mu_e m_p}{\bar{\mu} m_u} \biggr) 8 \chi^3 \frac{T}{T_e} + F(\chi) + \frac{8\pi^4}{15} \biggl( \frac{T}{T_e} \biggr)^4</math>

Derivation

We begin by defining the normalized total gas pressure as follows:

<math> p_\mathrm{total} \equiv \frac{1}{A_\mathrm{F}} \biggl[ P_\mathrm{gas} + P_\mathrm{deg} + P_\mathrm{rad} \biggr] . </math>

To derive the expression for <math>~p_\mathrm{total}</math> shown in the opening paragraph above, we begin by normalizing each component pressure independently.


Normalized Degenerate Electron Pressure

This normalization is trivial. Given the original expression for the pressure due to a degenerate electron gas (or a zero-temperature Fermi gas),

LSU Key.png

<math>~P_\mathrm{deg} = A_\mathrm{F} F(\chi) </math>

where:  <math>F(\chi) \equiv \chi(2\chi^2 - 3)(\chi^2 + 1)^{1/2} + 3\sinh^{-1}\chi</math>

and:   

<math>\chi \equiv (\rho/B_\mathrm{F})^{1/3}</math>

we see that,

<math> \frac{P_\mathrm{deg}}{A_\mathrm{F}} = F(\chi) . </math>


Normalized Ideal-Gas Pressure

Given the original expression for the pressure of an ideal gas,

LSU Key.png

<math>~P_\mathrm{gas} = \frac{\Re}{\bar{\mu}} \rho T</math>

along with the definitions of the physical constants, <math>~\Re</math>, <math>~A_\mathrm{F}</math>, and <math>~B_\mathrm{F}</math> provided in the accompanying Variables Appendix, we can write,

<math> \frac{P_\mathrm{gas}}{A_\mathrm{F}} = \frac{B_\mathrm{F}}{A_\mathrm{F}} \frac{\Re}{\bar{\mu}} \chi^3 T = \frac{\mu_e}{\bar{\mu}} \biggl[ \chi^3 T \biggr] \frac{8\pi m_p}{3} \biggl( \frac{m_e c}{h} \biggr)^3 \frac{3h^3}{\pi m_e^4 c^5} \biggl(k N_\mathrm{A} \biggr) = \biggl(m_p N_\mathrm{A} \biggr)\frac{\mu_e}{\bar{\mu}} \biggl[8 \chi^3 T \biggr] \frac{k}{ m_e c^2} . </math>

Therefore, letting <math>T_e \equiv m_e c^2/k</math> represent the temperature associated with the rest-mass energy of the electron, the normalized ideal gas pressure is,

<math> \frac{P_\mathrm{gas}}{A_\mathrm{F}} = \biggl(\frac{\mu_e m_p}{\bar{\mu} m_u} \biggr) \biggl[8 \chi^3 \frac{T}{T_e} \biggr] , </math>

where, by definition, the atomic mass unit is, <math>m_u \equiv (1/N_\mathrm{A})~\mathrm{g} = 0.992776 m_p</math>, that is, <math>~m_p/m_u = 1.007276</math>.


Normalized Radiation Pressure

Given the original expression for the radiation pressure,

LSU Key.png

<math>~P_\mathrm{rad} = \frac{1}{3} a_\mathrm{rad} T^4</math>

along with the definitions of the physical constants, <math>~A_\mathrm{F}</math>, and <math>~a_\mathrm{rad}</math> provided in the accompanying Variables Appendix, we can write,

<math> \frac{P_\mathrm{rad}}{A_\mathrm{F}} = \biggl( \frac{T^4}{3} \biggr) \frac{a_\mathrm{rad}}{A_\mathrm{F}} = \biggl( \frac{T^4}{3} \biggr) \frac{8\pi^5}{15}\frac{k^4}{(hc)^3} \frac{3h^3}{\pi m_e^4 c^5} = \frac{8\pi^4}{15} \biggl( \frac{T}{T_e} \biggr)^4 . </math>



Work-in-progress.png

Material that appears after this point in our presentation is under development and therefore
may contain incorrect mathematical equations and/or physical misinterpretations.
|   Go Home   |


NOTE: Still need to provide derivation of ZTF pressure in limit of very large densities. Also, in the subsection where degeneracy pressure is ignored, it would be good to introduce "standard" definition of <math>~\beta</math>.

Discussion

For simplicity of presentation, in what follows we will use

<math> \tau \equiv \frac{T}{T_e} </math>

to represent a normalized temperature, in addition to using <math>~\chi</math> to represent (the cube root of) the normalized mass density and <math>~p_\mathrm{total}</math> to represent the normalized total pressure.


Dominant Contributions

Let's examine which pressure contributions will dominate in various temperature-density regimes. Note, first, that <math>~m_p</math>/<math>~m_u</math>  <math>~\approx 1</math> and, for fully ionized gases, the ratio <math>~\mu_e</math><math>~/</math><math>~\bar{\mu}</math> is of order unity — more precisely, the ratio of these two molecular weights falls within the narrow range <math>~1 < </math> <math>~\mu_e</math><math>~/</math><math>~\bar{\mu}</math> <math>\le 2</math>. Hence, we can assume that the numerical coefficient of the first term in our expression for <math>~p_\mathrm{total}</math> is approximately <math>~8</math>, so the ratio of radiation pressure to gas pressure is,

<math> \frac{P_\mathrm{rad}}{P_\mathrm{gas}} \approx \frac{\pi^4}{15} \biggl( \frac{\tau}{\chi} \biggr)^3 </math> .

This means that radiation pressure will dominate over ideal gas pressure in any regime where,

<math> T \gg T_e \biggl[\frac{15}{\pi^4} \biggl(\frac{\rho}{B_F} \biggr) \biggr]^{1/3} </math> ,

that is, whenever,

<math> T_7 \gg 3.2 \biggl[\frac{\rho_1}{\mu_e} \biggr]^{1/3} </math> ,

where <math>~T_7</math> is the temperature expressed in units of <math>~10^7~K</math> and <math>~\rho_1</math> is the matter density expressed in units of <math>~\mathrm{g~cm}^{-3}</math>.


Second, note that the function <math>~F(\chi)</math> can be written in a simpler form when examining regions of either very low or very high matter densities. Specifically — see our separate discussion of the Zero-Temperature Fermi gas — in the limit <math>~\chi \ll 1</math>,

<math> F(\chi) \approx \frac{8}{5} \chi^5 </math> ;

and in the limit <math>\chi \gg 1</math>,

<math> F(\chi) \approx 2 \chi^4 </math> .

Hence, at low densities (<math>\chi \ll 1</math>),

<math> \frac{P_\mathrm{gas}}{P_\mathrm{deg}} \approx 5 \tau \chi^{-2} ~~~~~ \mathrm{and} ~~~~~ \frac{P_\mathrm{rad}}{P_\mathrm{deg}} \approx \biggl(\frac{\pi^4}{3}\biggr) \tau^4 \chi^{-5} ; </math>

and at high densities (<math>\chi \gg 1</math>),

<math> \frac{P_\mathrm{gas}}{P_\mathrm{deg}} \approx 4 \biggl( \frac{\tau}{\chi} \biggr) ~~~~~ \mathrm{and} ~~~~~ \frac{P_\mathrm{rad}}{P_\mathrm{deg}} \approx \frac{4 \pi^4}{15} \biggl( \frac{\tau}{\chi} \biggr)^4 . </math>

Just Ideal-Gas and Radiation

In certain density-temperature regimes, contributions from the electron degeneracy pressure can be ignored and, to a good approximation, the normalized total pressure will take the form,

<math>~p_\mathrm{total} = C_g \chi^3 \tau + C_r \tau^4 ,</math>

where the coefficients,

<math> C_g \equiv 8\biggl(\frac{\mu_e m_p}{\bar{\mu} m_u} \biggr) ~~~~~ \mathrm{and} ~~~~~ C_r \equiv \frac{8\pi^4}{15} . </math>

Given any values for the pair of state variables, <math>~\chi</math> and <math>~\tau</math>, the third state variable can be calculated analytically from this specified function, <math>~p_\mathrm{total}(\chi,\tau)</math>. It is easy to see as well that, given any values for the pair of state variables, <math>~p_\mathrm{total}</math> and <math>~\tau</math>, the third state variable can be calculated analytically from the function,

<math>\chi^3(p_\mathrm{total},\tau) = \frac{1}{C_g \tau} \biggl[ p_\mathrm{total} - C_r \tau^4 \biggr] .</math>

The third desirable relationship between the three state variables, <math>~\tau(p_\mathrm{total},\chi^3)</math>, can also be expressed analytically, but the resulting expression is not as simple as the first two because it results from the solution of a quartic equation. As is detailed in the accompanying discussion, the proper expression is,

Whitworth's (1981) Isothermal Free-Energy Surface

© 2014 - 2021 by Joel E. Tohline
|   H_Book Home   |   YouTube   |
Appendices: | Equations | Variables | References | Ramblings | Images | myphys.lsu | ADS |
Recommended citation:   Tohline, Joel E. (2021), The Structure, Stability, & Dynamics of Self-Gravitating Fluids, a (MediaWiki-based) Vistrails.org publication, https://www.vistrails.org/index.php/User:Tohline/citation